Every Childlike Author needs a Playground.

Tactical Appropriation and Christian Warfare

Of late I have been intentionally abrasive on social media. There are multiple reasons for this. One of the more simple reasons was to test a defensive and offensive tactic. Distilled into an abstract term, it can be described as Tactical Appropriation.

Tactical Appropriation is a method which you can adopt to achieve devastating results against your opponents.


Christian Warfare

The premise of tactical appropriation is to appropriate all tactics used by your enemy and use them to defend yourself, usually via counterattack. It is near in kinship to a tactic summed up by the old adage, “the best defense is a good offense.”

But it is much better summed up  by the Bible: “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

Anyone familiar with the Bible may remember that Jesus had some choice word to say about this concept during his famous “Sermon on the Mount.” Without going into a long debate concerning Jesus’ more “celestial” or “heavenly” law compared to Moses’ “terrestrial,” and “temporal” law, all I will say on the subject is that Moses’ law reflects Jesus’ law.  The idea is the same for both: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Or as Jesus put his second greatest commandment, “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”

Moses law attempted to circumvent sin and crime via lex talionis. If you committed a crime, the punishment would be equivalent to what you did to your neighbor.

Gouge out an eye, and you get your eye gouged out.

Jesus tried to circumvent sin and crime using the same concept. If you love your neighbor as yourself, and don’t want your eye gouged out, then don’t gouge out your neighbor’s eye. He advocated for a spiritual precondition rather than temporal punishment post factum.

The other aspect of this is the concept of turning the other cheek. I will just point out now that it is not wrong to turn the other cheek.

It is also not wrong to retaliate in self-defense.

Jesus’ celestial or heavenly law generally has the reputation of being more merciful than the law of Moses and less retaliatory. Paradoxically, it’s even worse for the original perpetrator of a crime or sin to have his victim return kindness for evil.

If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink; For thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the LORD shall reward thee.

In fact, it could be argued that by not retaliating you are making it worse for your enemy than by literally defending yourself from his attacks.

By not retaliating, you are condemning your enemy to a fate worse than death. Turning your cheek is already a form of retaliation.

If someone attacks you, or attacks your beliefs, you have the moral prerogative to retaliate.

When you defend yourself from attack, you are morally and ethically authorized to use any and every method and tactic which your enemy first uses against you. This is the law as interpreted by both Moses and Jesus.

Martyrs are, of course, rewarded in heaven more handsomely than those who died fighting for a righteous cause. But nobody wants to die, and nobody likes losing.

Very few people have what it takes to be a martyr. As an every day Joe, you should develop an ability to defend yourself.

One way of defending yourself is via Tactical Appropriation.

Tactical Appropriation is the method necessary to successfully defend against a ruthless attacker.

Your enemies are ruthless. They will escalate their tactics to overwhelm and defeat you.

If they use rhetoric to attack you, use rhetoric to attack them. If they insult you, insult them back. If they pull a knife on you, pull a knife on them. If they pull a gun, draw your own gun.

Remember, you are not trying to get revenge. Defending yourself is not revenge.

Defend yourself successfully by using their own tactics against them. Do not escalate until they escalate. You aren’t limited to their tactics, you are only limited by their level of escalation.

Once your enemy crosses the line, you have officially lost ground and are in the process of being invaded. You must cross the line in retaliation and take back every inch you lost, or you will lose it forever. The best defense is a good offense.

In order to retake lost ground, you must be willing to invade enemy territory.

Sometimes escalation is unavoidable. In order to win your battles, you must escalate to at least the same degree as your opponent. When your enemy attacked you, they already threw kindness out the window. It is not kind to attack someone.

In order to defeat your attacker, you must also throw kindness out the window. War, by its very nature, is unkind and cruel. Therefore, wage war like a soldier of Christ and reestablish Christendom. Turning your cheek is an option only if you wish to be a martyr.

But to be a martyr, you have to die first.

I suggest you fight, and live.


6 responses

  1. About the picture- I really dislike such illustrations which portray the Crusades as holy and just wars. To anyone who takes more than a cursory glance at history, it is painstakingly clear that the Crusades were greed-driven and justified by religion. There are numerous occurrences in which Crusaders crippled entire cities for personal benefit. So, I’m sorry, but no. If you want to argue that, please get your facts straight first.

    Liked by 1 person

    February 8, 2016 at 5:19 pm

    • The only thing that is “painstakingly clear” is that you’re a liar, and not even a good one at that. Try reading the article before you comment next time.


      February 8, 2016 at 9:16 pm

      • As a student of history, I happen to know that I am indeed telling the truth. There exists much historical evidence of this, and furthermore, although each is certainly entitled to her or his own opinion, your response to my comment portrays a chilling close-mindedness about you which makes me genuinely scared for the future of humanity. Are you not of the opinion that one should at least consider when presented with evidence contrary to one’s thoughts? Or are you, perhaps, one of those who instead attempt to knock down those who are different from yourself?
        You don’t have to answer to me, but perhaps these questions are the ones you should be asking yourself.

        Liked by 1 person

        February 8, 2016 at 9:38 pm

        • You’re a liar and disingenuous. I said nothing about the Crusades.

          Are you not of the opinion that one should at least consider when presented with evidence contrary to one’s thoughts?

          You’re free to present your evidence once you find it.


          February 8, 2016 at 10:28 pm

        • You call me a liar- if not about the Crusades, which my comment was mainly centered on, then what exactly was I lying about?
          Were I so inclined, I could cite a veritable hundreds of sources with which to disprove your statement. Personally, I will believe firsthand accounts and world renowned historical analysis over the religiously fueled “information” you happened to find on the Internet.
          You honestly remind me of the Crucible- which, I assure you, is not a good thing. Your reasoning is unsubstantial and circular. You demand that which you mistakenly believe you are owed. In short, you are the very embodiment of what gives Christians a bad name. You should be ashamed of yourself.
          The next time you want to argue from a historical standpoint, I suggest you first read a history textbook that has been published during this century. I truly feel sorry for you and those like you.

          Liked by 1 person

          February 8, 2016 at 10:36 pm

        • I could cite a veritable hundreds of sources with which to disprove your statement.

          Then it should be easy for you to cite just one. I’m still waiting to see the evidence I’ve apparently already rejected according to you


          February 8, 2016 at 11:05 pm

Share your thoughts!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s